Some have better bundles of plugins and virtual instruments. Some are better for composition and arranging. They do differ in workflow and layout, so you need to find one that fits your style of working. (even then FL Studio is available on MAC, but I am not sure about Reaper) If currency isn't a problem, then go all out with Nuendo/Pro tools. (save the money) Unless you already have a MAC setup. IF you don't want to go crazy with spending then go for something like Reaper, FL Studio, etc. Coming in new, I can see wanting to weigh the pros/cons. The one you are most versed in is generally going to be the one you get the best results out of. The plugins you use will also matter much more than the DAW. So many people at this point have recorded/mixed/mastered with great results on every DAW available. The thing that will make the most difference is which one you get comfortable using, and understand the most. Truth of the matter isn't so much in what DAW you use, at least not these days. If you have the Helix it can be a great interface. If you have Helix, or Helix rack, it even has a Mic input if you want to try vocals. Works great for him, and he does multi-usb mic recording. I setup my cousin with Reaper, he does a sports podcast every Saturnday. Especially with the latest FLS 20 release. As a DAW it is fantastic, great for those that don't want to be limited to the traditional linear recording environments in most other DAWs, although it can can be used that way for the most part. That only takes 10 seconds, then I am good to go. It gets rid of all the underuns that happen on a large project recall (on first load up). Then immediately switch back to Helix ASIO. The only hiccup really is remembering to Set ASIO drivers to FL ASIO, or ASIO4All.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |